From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hayes

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Nov 3, 2005
No. 01-05-00891-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 3, 2005)

Opinion

No. 01-05-00891-CR

Opinion issued November 3, 2005.

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Panel consists of Justices TAFT, KEYES, and HANKS.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relator, Carl Douglas Hayes, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining, in essence, that the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles has failed properly to calculate his time credits. This Court has no mandamus jurisdiction over officials on the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004). Furthermore, relator has made no allegation or showing that mandamus is necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. Cf. In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Hayes

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Nov 3, 2005
No. 01-05-00891-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 3, 2005)
Case details for

In re Hayes

Case Details

Full title:IN RE CARL DOUGLAS HAYES, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Nov 3, 2005

Citations

No. 01-05-00891-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 3, 2005)