From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Haskins

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jan 6, 2016
NO. 03-15-00406-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 6, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 03-15-00406-CV

01-06-2016

In re Brad Haskins and Sue Miller


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators have filed a motion to dismiss their petition for writ of mandamus. Relators state that real party in interest CACH has nonsuited the Rule 202 proceeding from which this proceeding originates and that the trial court has signed an order of nonsuit vacating its June 12, 2015 contempt order and dismissing the case, rendering Relators' mandamus petition moot. Relators certify that they have conferred with real party in interest CACH and that it does not oppose this motion. We grant the motion and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

/s/_________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland Dismissed on Relators' Motion Filed: January 6, 2016


Summaries of

In re Haskins

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jan 6, 2016
NO. 03-15-00406-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 6, 2016)
Case details for

In re Haskins

Case Details

Full title:In re Brad Haskins and Sue Miller

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Jan 6, 2016

Citations

NO. 03-15-00406-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 6, 2016)