From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hartmann

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Aug 19, 2021
No. 2021-166 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 19, 2021)

Opinion

2021-166

08-19-2021

In re: MICHAEL OTTO HARTMANN, Petitioner


This order is nonprecedential.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

ON PETITION

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Otto Hartmann submits a petition for a writ of mandamus, attempting to invoke this court's "original jurisdiction" to assert various claims, including contract and federal securities claims.

The All Writs Act provides that the federal courts "may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law." 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). The Act is not itself a grant of jurisdiction. Clinton v. Goldsmith, 526 U.S. 529, 534-35 (1999). This court does not have original jurisdiction over Mr. Hartmann's claims. Nor does his submission reference any agency or trial court action that would eventually be subject to this court's jurisdiction on direct appeal that would give us authority to consider a mandamus request. We therefore dismiss his petition.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The petition is dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Hartmann

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Aug 19, 2021
No. 2021-166 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 19, 2021)
Case details for

In re Hartmann

Case Details

Full title:In re: MICHAEL OTTO HARTMANN, Petitioner

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 19, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-166 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 19, 2021)