From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 4, 2010
71 A.D.3d 1223 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 507999.

March 4, 2010.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 5, 2009, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Wanda A. Harris, Syracuse, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Gary Leibowitz of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Lahtinen, Stein and Garry, JJ., concur.


Claimant worked at a nursing home for approximately 30 years. At her administrator's request, she agreed to assume the position of director of human resources. Claimant was subsequently overwhelmed with the duties for which she was responsible and ultimately resigned from the position due to her inexperience and the lack of assistance. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant appeals.

We affirm. "It is well settled that dissatisfaction with one's workload or job responsibilities does not constitute good cause for leaving one's employment" ( Matter of Hayes [Commissioner of Labor], 19 AD3d 916, 917 [citations omitted]; see Matter of Zakrzewski [Commissioner of Labor], 305 AD2d 790, 790; Matter of Zalinka [Commissioner of Labor], 290 AD2d 629, 630). Here, claimant complained that she was unable to perform the many duties entailed in the new position without assistance and indicated that she resigned because such assistance was not forthcoming. Although claimant stated that the stress of the job caused her to lose sleep and feel sick, she was not advised by a doctor to resign from her job for health reasons ( see Matter of Dunlop [Commissioner of Labor], 62 AD3d 1186, 1186). Accordingly, notwithstanding the existence of evidence in the record that would support a contrary conclusion, substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that claimant left her job for personal and noncompellihg reasons.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 4, 2010
71 A.D.3d 1223 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Harris

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of WANDA A. HARRIS, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 4, 2010

Citations

71 A.D.3d 1223 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 1726
897 N.Y.S.2d 533

Citing Cases

Jennings v. Com. of Labor

Here, claimant testified that the employer was overly critical of her work performance, she had personal…

In re Patrick Doyle

The Board, in affirming the denial of benefits, concluded that claimant had voluntarily left his employment…