From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Harmata

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Jul 13, 2017
No. S241618 (Cal. Jul. 13, 2017)

Opinion

S241618

07-13-2017

HARMATA ON DISCIPLINE


Recommended discipline imposed

The court orders that JOHN MICHAEL HARMATA, State Bar Number 131668, is suspended from the practice of law in California for three years, execution of that period of suspension is stayed, and he is placed on probation for three years subject to the following conditions:

1. JOHN MICHAEL HARMATA is suspended from the practice of law for a minimum of the first two years of probation and he will remain suspended until the following conditions are satisfied:

i. He makes restitution to Glenda Rolle in the amount of $1,200 plus 10 percent interest per year from July 30, 2015 (or reimburses the Client Security Fund, to the extent of any payment from the Fund to Glenda Rolle, in accordance with Business and Professions Code section 6140.5) and furnishes satisfactory proof to the State Bar's Office of Probation in Los Angeles; and

ii. JOHN MICHAEL HARMATA provides proof to the State Bar Court of his rehabilitation, fitness to practice and present learning and ability in the general law.
(Rules Proc. of State Bar, tit. IV, Stds. for Atty. Sanctions for Prof. Misconduct, std. 1.2(c)(1).)

2. JOHN MICHAEL HARMATA must comply with the other conditions of probation recommended by the Hearing Department of the State Bar Court in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on March 9, 2017.

3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if JOHN MICHAEL HARMATA has complied with all conditions of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied and that suspension will be terminated.

JOHN MICHAEL HARMATA must also take and pass the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination during the period of his suspension and provide satisfactory proof of such passage to the State Bar's Office of Probation in Los Angeles within the same period. Failure to do so may result in suspension. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.10(b).)

JOHN MICHAEL HARMATA must also comply with California Rules of Court, rule 9.20, and perform the acts specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar days, respectively, after the effective date of this order. Failure to do so may result in disbarment or suspension.

Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section 6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7 and as a money judgment. One-third of the costs must be paid with his membership fees for each of the years 2018, 2019, and 2020. If JOHN MICHAEL HARMATA fails to pay any installment as described above, or as may be modified by the State Bar Court, the remaining balance is due and payable immediately.


Summaries of

In re Harmata

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Jul 13, 2017
No. S241618 (Cal. Jul. 13, 2017)
Case details for

In re Harmata

Case Details

Full title:HARMATA ON DISCIPLINE

Court:California Supreme Court (Minute Order)

Date published: Jul 13, 2017

Citations

No. S241618 (Cal. Jul. 13, 2017)