From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Harding

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Mar 8, 2004
No. 05-04-00259-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 8, 2004)

Opinion

No. 05-04-00259-CV.

Opinion issued March 8, 2004.

Original Proceeding from the Probate Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 02-7300-MI.

Writ of Mandamus Denied.

Before Justices WHITTINGTON, O'NEILL, and LANG.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relator contends the county clerk erred in not filing documents tendered by him and not allowing him to see his mental health commitment case file. The facts of this original proceeding are known to the parties so we do not recite them here. Further, because all dispositive issues are clearly settled in law, we issue this memorandum opinion pursuant to rule 52.8(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(d). We conclude the relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a); Tex. Health Safety Code Ann. § 571.015 (Vernon 2003).


Summaries of

In re Harding

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Mar 8, 2004
No. 05-04-00259-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 8, 2004)
Case details for

In re Harding

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DEAN VENMORE HARDING, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Mar 8, 2004

Citations

No. 05-04-00259-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 8, 2004)