From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Haberman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 2011
85 A.D.3d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2010-04743.

June 14, 2011.

In a hybrid proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Long Beach dated December 29, 2003, which revoked a building permit previously issued to the petitioners/plaintiffs on August 12, 2003, and action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the petitioners/plaintiffs are entitled to the building permit, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Marber, J.), entered February 1, 2010, which granted the motion of the petitioners/plaintiffs to disqualify the firm of Meyer, Suozzi, English Klein, P.C., as the respondents/defendants' cocounsel.

Meyer, Suozzi, English Klein, P.C., Garden City, N.Y. (Jeffrey G. Stark of counsel), and Corey E. Klein, Corporation Counsel, Long Beach, N.Y.), for respondents/defendants-appellants (one brief filed).

Jaspan Schlesinger LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Steven R. Schlesinger of counsel), Herrick Feinstein, New York, N.Y. (Scott Mollen of counsel), Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, New York, N.Y. (Victor A. Kovner and Lance Koonce of counsel), Duane Morris, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Thomas R. Newman of counsel), and Jacob Haberman, New York, N.Y., for petitioners/plaintiffs-respondents (one brief filed).

Before: Rivera, J.P., Florio, Dickerson and Eng, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the motion to disqualify the firm of Meyer, Suozzi, English Klein, PC, as cocounsel for the respondents/defendants ( see Kassis v Teacher's Ins. Annuity Assn., 93 NY2d 611; Solow v Grace Co., 83 NY2d 303; M.A.C. Duff, Inc. v ASMAC, LLC, 61 AD3d 828; Columbus Constr. Co., Inc. v Petrillo Bldrs. Supply Corp., 20 AD3d 383).


Summaries of

In re Haberman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 2011
85 A.D.3d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Haberman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SINCLAIR HABERMAN et al., Respondents, v. ZONING BOARD OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 14, 2011

Citations

85 A.D.3d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 5275
925 N.Y.S.2d 834

Citing Cases

Town of Oyster Bay v. 55 Motor Ave. Co.

Here, the Town failed to present any evidence that Fenchel did not acquire information that was significant…

Rovner v. Rantzer

not supersede a clear showing that disqualification is warranted’ " (Gjoni v. Swan Club, Inc., 134 A.D.3d…