From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Haarmann

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Feb 4, 2015
NO. 09-15-00028-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 4, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 09-15-00028-CR

02-04-2015

IN RE ALBERT F. HAARMANN


Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Albert F. Haarmann filed an original and amended petition for writ of mandamus, asking this Court to order his trial counsel to give Haarmann his case file in Cause Number 8843 in the 411th District Court of San Jacinto County. Neither petition invoke this Court's mandamus jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004) (A court of appeals may issue a writ of mandamus against a judge of a district or county court in the court's district, or issue a writ that is necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court.). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus.

Cause Number 8843 was affirmed on appeal and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals subsequently denied Haarmann's petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Ex parte Haarmann, No. WR-74213-01, 2010 WL 3430873, at *1 (Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 25, 2010) (order, not designated for publication).

PETITION DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM Submitted on February 3, 2015
Opinion Delivered February 4, 2015
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.


Summaries of

In re Haarmann

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Feb 4, 2015
NO. 09-15-00028-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 4, 2015)
Case details for

In re Haarmann

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ALBERT F. HAARMANN

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Feb 4, 2015

Citations

NO. 09-15-00028-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 4, 2015)

Citing Cases

In re Haarmann

This Court previously affirmed appellant's conviction for sexual assault. See Haarmann v. State, No.…