From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re H. E

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 17, 2010
243 P.3d 138 (Or. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

Nos. 09192J; Petition Number 09192J01; A145662.

Submitted October 11, 2010.

November 17, 2010.

Appeal from the Lane County Circuit Court, Eveleen Henry, Judge.

James A. Palmer filed the brief for appellant.

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Greg Rios, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded.


Mother appeals a permanency judgment changing the case plan from reunification to adoption. She argues, among other contentions, that the juvenile court erred in failing to make and include in the judgment the statutorily required findings. ORS 419B.449(2); ORS 419B.476(2), (5). The state concedes that the judgment is deficient and should be remanded in order for the juvenile court to include the required findings and determinations. See State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. J .F. B., 230 Or. App. 106, 115, 214 P.3d 827 (2009) (remanding for juvenile court to enter judgments that comply with ORS 419B.476). We agree with and accept the state's concession. Given our remand, we do not reach the other issues mother raises on appeal. See id. at 118 ("The other issues raised by mother on appeal are premature at this time.").

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

In re H. E

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 17, 2010
243 P.3d 138 (Or. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

In re H. E

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of H. E., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 17, 2010

Citations

243 P.3d 138 (Or. Ct. App. 2010)
243 P.3d 138