From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Grigsby

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Aug 17, 2017
167 A.3d 551 (D.C. 2017)

Opinion

No. 16–BG–1069

08-17-2017

IN RE Sherlock V. GRIGSBY, Respondent.


ORDER

PER CURIAM

The Board on Professional Responsibility concluded that respondent engaged in intentional misappropriation and recommends that the respondent be disbarred. Neither respondent nor Bar Counsel has excepted to that conclusion and recommendation. We therefore accept the Board's recommendation. D.C. Bar R. XI, § 9 (h)(2).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that respondent Sherlock V. Grigsby is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. For purposes of reinstatement, the period of disbarment will begin to run when Mr. Grigsby has filed an affidavit demonstrating full compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g).


Summaries of

In re Grigsby

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Aug 17, 2017
167 A.3d 551 (D.C. 2017)
Case details for

In re Grigsby

Case Details

Full title:IN RE Sherlock V. GRIGSBY, Respondent.

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Date published: Aug 17, 2017

Citations

167 A.3d 551 (D.C. 2017)