From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Grigsby

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Aug 17, 2017
No. 16-BG-1069 (D.C. Aug. 17, 2017)

Opinion

No. 16-BG-1069

08-17-2017

IN RE SHERLOCK V. GRIGSBY, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 494432


Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. Board Docket Nos. 14-BD-103, 14-BD-105, 14-BD-106 & 14-BD-107
DDNs: 2013-D064, 2013-D439, 2013-D240, 2013-D100 BEFORE: Beckwith, Associate Judge; McLeese, Associate Judge; and Farrell, Senior Judge.

ORDER

The Board on Professional Responsibility concluded that respondent engaged in intentional misappropriation and recommends that the respondent be disbarred. Neither respondent nor Bar Counsel has excepted to that conclusion and recommendation. We therefore accept the Board's recommendation. D.C. Bar R. XI, § 9 (h)(2).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that respondent Sherlock V. Grigsby is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. For purposes of reinstatement, the period of disbarment will begin to run when Mr. Grigsby has filed an affidavit demonstrating full compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g).

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

In re Grigsby

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Aug 17, 2017
No. 16-BG-1069 (D.C. Aug. 17, 2017)
Case details for

In re Grigsby

Case Details

Full title:IN RE SHERLOCK V. GRIGSBY, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 494432

Court:DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Aug 17, 2017

Citations

No. 16-BG-1069 (D.C. Aug. 17, 2017)