From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Grana Y Montero S.A.A. Sec. Litig.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Sep 14, 2021
Civil Action 2:17-cv-01105-LDH-ST (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 14, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:17-cv-01105-LDH-ST

09-14-2021

In re GRAÑA Y MONTERO S.A.A. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS.


CLASS ACTION

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES AND AWARD TO PLAINTIFF PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. §78u-4(a)(4)

The Honorable LaShann DeArcy Hall United States District Judge

This matter having come before the Court on December 1, 2020, on the motion of Lead Counsel for an award of attorneys' fees and expenses (the “Fee Motion”), the Court, having considered all papers filed and proceedings conducted herein, having found the Settlement of this Litigation to be fair, reasonable and adequate, and otherwise being fully informed in the premises and good cause appearing therefore;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:

1. This Order incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated July 2, 2020 (the “Stipulation”), and all capitalized terms used, but not defined herein, shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation.

2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this application and all matters relating thereto, including all Members of the Settlement Class who have not timely and validly requested exclusion.

3. Notice of Lead Counsel's Fee Motion was given to all Settlement Class Members who could be located with reasonable effort. The form and method of notifying the Settlement Class of the Fee Motion met the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 15 U.S.C. §78u-4(a)(7), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, due process, and any other applicable law, constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and constituted due and sufficient notice to all persons and entities entitled thereto.

4. The Court hereby awards Lead Counsel attorneys' fees of 25% of the Settlement Amount, plus expenses in the amount of $54,774.05, together with the interest earned on both amounts for the same period and at the same rate as that earned on the Settlement Fund until paid. The Court finds that the amount of fees awarded is fair, reasonable, and appropriate under the “percentage-of-recovery” method.

5. The awarded attorneys' fees and expenses and interest earned thereon, shall be paid to Lead Counsel immediately upon execution of the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice and this Order and subject to the terms, conditions, and obligations of the Stipulation, and in particular, ¶6.2 thereof, which terms, conditions, and obligations are incorporated herein.

6. In making this award of fees and expenses to Lead Counsel, the Court has considered and found that:

(a) the Settlement has created a fund of $20,000,000 in cash, and numerous Settlement Class Members who submit, or have submitted, valid Proof of Claim and Release forms will benefit from the Settlement created by Lead Counsel;

(b) over 14, 000 copies of the Notice were disseminated to potential Settlement Class Members indicating that Lead Counsel would move for attorneys' fees in an amount not to exceed 25% of the Settlement Amount and for expenses in an amount not to exceed $100,000, plus interest on both amounts;

(c) Lead Counsel have pursued the Litigation and achieved the Settlement with skill, perseverance, and diligent advocacy;

(d) Lead Counsel have expended substantial time and effort pursuing the Litigation on behalf of the Settlement Class;

(e) Lead Counsel pursued the Litigation on a contingent basis, having received no compensation during the Litigation, and any fee amount has been contingent on the result achieved;

(f) the Litigation involves complex factual and legal issues and, in the absence of settlement, would involve lengthy proceedings who resolution would be uncertain;

(g) had Lead Counsel not achieved the Settlement, there would remain a significant risk that the Settlement Class may have recovered less or nothing from Defendants;

(h) Plaintiffs' Counsel have devoted over 3, 900 hours, with a lodestar value of $2,483,523.75, to achieve the Settlement;

(i) public policy concerns favor the award of reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses in securities class action litigation; and

(j) the attorney's fees and expenses awarded are fair and reasonable and consistent with awards in similar cases within the Second Circuit.

7. Any appeal or any challenge affecting this Court's approval regarding the Fee Motion shall in no way disturb or affect the finality of the Judgment entered with respect to the Settlement.

8. Plaintiff Marcia Goldberg is awarded $4,000, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §78u-4(a)(4), related to her representation of the Settlement Class.

9. In the event that the Settlement is terminated or does not become Final or the Effective Date does not occur in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation, this Order shall be rendered null and void to the extent provided in the Stipulation and shall be vacated in accordance with the Stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Grana Y Montero S.A.A. Sec. Litig.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Sep 14, 2021
Civil Action 2:17-cv-01105-LDH-ST (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 14, 2021)
Case details for

In re Grana Y Montero S.A.A. Sec. Litig.

Case Details

Full title:In re GRAÑA Y MONTERO S.A.A. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Sep 14, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 2:17-cv-01105-LDH-ST (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 14, 2021)