From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Glatman

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 24, 2007
922 A.2d 707 (N.J. 2007)

Opinion

May 24, 2007.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-300, concluding that ARTHUR GLATMAN of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3(lack of diligence), RPC 1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation), RPC 1.15(b) (failure to disburse funds promptly), RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ARTHUR GLATMAN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Glatman

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 24, 2007
922 A.2d 707 (N.J. 2007)
Case details for

In re Glatman

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ARTHUR GLATMAN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 24, 2007

Citations

922 A.2d 707 (N.J. 2007)
922 A.2d 707