Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
In re Gantz

2 Citing cases

  1. In re Colonial Realty Co.

    226 B.R. 513 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1998)   Cited 48 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that courts award the "market value of the property at the time of transfer, less the consideration received . . ."

    Courts determine reasonable equivalence by considering all the facts of the case. See Morris Communications, 914 F.2d at 466-67; Gantz v. Colonial Cent. Sav. Bank, F.S.B. (In re Gantz), 162 B.R. 890, 896-97 (D.Wyo. 1994). Fair market value, while not dispositive, is an important element and often a starting point for determining reasonably equivalent value.

  2. In re Prince Gardner, Inc.

    220 B.R. 63 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 1998)   Cited 21 times
    Determining that “BFP does not, as a matter of law, equate the price received in these circumstances with the reasonably equivalent value required [under 548(a)(1)(B) ].”

    Expressed in actual dollar terms however, the results are as follows: In re Gantz, 162 B.R. 890 (D.Wyo. 1994). The difference between the price paid and fair market value was less than $15,000.00.