From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re F.V.H.

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Nov 26, 2003
No. 01-03-00040-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 26, 2003)

Opinion

No. 01-03-00040-CV

Opinion issued November 26, 2003.

On Appeal from the 245th District Court Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 0103043J.

Guillermo Harper, Attorney for Appellant.

Sandra D. Hachem, William S. Cox, and Janice Goff, Attorneys for Appellee.

Panel consists of Justices HEDGES, HANKS, and HIGLEY.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Information from the district clerk's office indicates that a judgment was signed by the trial court on October 21, 2002, and that appellant, Guillermo Harper, filed a notice of appeal on January 8, 2003. On February 5, 2003, appellant filed with this Court a "Declaration of Inability to Pay Costs." No record has been filed. On October 9, 2003, this Court issued an order noting that pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellant Procedure 20.1(c)(1), to be timely filed, an affidavit of indigence must have been filed with the notice of appeal or within 15 days after the filing of the notice of appeal, if the appellant has filed a proper motion for extension of time to file it pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1(e). In the order, we noted that appellant had done neither and advised him that unless the appellate filing fee of $125 was paid by November 3, 2003, the Court would dismiss his appeal.

In response to the October 9, 2003 order, appellant has filed a "Motion for Leave to Appeal," in which he states that he was misled by the State Counsel for Offender's Legal Handbook into filing the type of affidavit of indigence that he did. He requests that pursuant to Wells v. Breton Mill Apartments, 85 S.W.3d 823 (Tex. App.-Amarillo 2001, no pet.), we invoke Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 2 to suspend Rule 20.(c)(1) and accept as timely filed the affidavit of indigence attached to his "Motion for Leave to Appeal." We decline to do so.

November 3, 2003 has passed and appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee. We overrule appellant's motion for leave to appeal and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex.R.App.P. 5, 42.3(b)(c).


Summaries of

In re F.V.H.

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Nov 26, 2003
No. 01-03-00040-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 26, 2003)
Case details for

In re F.V.H.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE F.V.H., A Minor Child

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Nov 26, 2003

Citations

No. 01-03-00040-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 26, 2003)