In re Finkle

4 Citing cases

  1. In re Masters

    137 B.R. 254 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1992)   Cited 21 times
    Allowing prejudgment interest from the earliest date of demand

    Therefore, to defeat the trustee's status, a creditor must possess a perfected security interest on the date the debtor filed a bankruptcy petition. First Eastern Bank, N.A. v. Minichello (In re Minichello), 120 B.R. 17, 20 (Bankr.M.D.Pa. 1990); Bailey v. Farris (In re Farris), 40 B.R. 58, 60 (Bankr.M.D.Ala. 1984); Feldman v. Schreiber (In re Finkle), 38 B.R. 101, 102 (Bankr.D.Md. 1984); Bezanson v. Indian Head Bank Trust Co. (In re Howell), 28 B.R. 273, 275-76 (Bankr.D.Maine 1983). The determination of whether a party has perfected its security interest is governed by state law.

  2. Joliet-Will Cty. Community Action Agency

    58 B.R. 973 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1986)   Cited 9 times

    Accord, Cherno v. Dutch American Mercantile Corporation, 353 F.2d 147 (2d Cir. 1965); Rosenbaum v. Century Indemnity Co., 168 F.2d 917 (2d Cir. 1948), cert. den. 335 U.S. 885, 69 S.Ct. 238, 93 L.Ed. 424 (1948). See also In re Finkle, 38 B.R. 101 (Bankr.D.Md. 1984). In holding the rights of the trustee as a perfect lien creditor superior to any equitable lien of the Grantor Agencies, the court necessarily concludes that the funds, having become property of the bankruptcy estate, have been paid out for the purposes for which they were appropriated, thereby distinguishing the trustee in bankruptcy from an ordinary prepetition judgment creditor.

  3. Matter of Einoder

    55 B.R. 319 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1985)   Cited 95 times
    Holding that Chapter 13 debtors have standing to bring avoidance actions by reasoning that Chapter 13 trustee has standing, but little incentive to bring avoidance actions that will result in benefit to debtors of recovering exempt assets

    Thus, the bankruptcy trustee, by virtue of his or her status as a hypothetical lien creditor under ยง 544(a), can always defeat such an unperfected lien interest in personalty. In re Finkle, 38 B.R. 101, 103 (Bankr.D.Mary. 1984); In re Henzler Mfg. Corp., 36 B.R. 303, 306 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 1984); O.P.M. Leasing Services, 23 B.R. at 120.

  4. In re Landmark

    48 B.R. 626 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1985)   Cited 8 times

    In Re Hastings, 4 B.R. 292 (Bankr.D.Minn. 1980); In Re Finkle, 38 B.R. 101 (Bankr.D.Md. 1984). However, the Trustee in this case took no action to avoid the mortgage, either during the original administration or since the re-opening of this case.