From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Esthay

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Apr 15, 2015
NO. 03-15-00217-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 15, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 03-15-00217-CV

04-15-2015

In re Kirt Allen Esthay


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM CONCHO COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Kirt Allen Esthay, an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. In his petition, Esthay asks us to issue a writ of mandamus directed to the Runnels County Sheriff and the Concho County District Clerk.

By statute, this Court has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus against "a judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals district" and other writs as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221. Neither the Runnels County Sheriff nor the Concho County District Clerk is a party against whom we may issue a writ of mandamus. Nor has Esthay demonstrated that the exercise of our writ power is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. We have no jurisdiction to grant Esthay any relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

/s/_________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field Filed: April 15, 2015


Summaries of

In re Esthay

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Apr 15, 2015
NO. 03-15-00217-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 15, 2015)
Case details for

In re Esthay

Case Details

Full title:In re Kirt Allen Esthay

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Apr 15, 2015

Citations

NO. 03-15-00217-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 15, 2015)

Citing Cases

In re Rodriguez

Neither the Comal County Sheriff's Office nor Sheriff Mark Reynolds is a party against whom we may issue a…