From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Estate of Griest

Supreme Court of California
Jun 9, 1888
76 Cal. 497 (Cal. 1888)

Opinion

         Department Two

         Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Sonoma County distributing the estate of a deceased person.

         COUNSEL:

         J. H. McGee, J. T. Campbell, and W. F. Russell, for Appellants.

          A. B. Ware, and L. A. Norton, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: McFarland, J. Thornton, J., and Sharpstein, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          McFARLAND, Judge

         This is an appeal by the children and grandchildren of Peter Griest, deceased, from an order of the superior court sitting in probate, distributing to Eliza Griest, surviving widow of said Peter, certain money paid to the executor of his estate by a certain mutual benefit corporation called the Order of Mutual Companions. The debts of the estate were all paid, and no question is made by creditors or any person other than the appellants herein.

         The facts of the case are fully stated in Order of Mutual Companions v. Eliza Griest et al ., this day decided by this court, ante, p. 494. After the decision of the latter case in the court below, the said Order of Mutual Companions paid the money to the executor of said estate, and the court distributed it, as aforesaid, to the respondent herein, Eliza Griest.

         There is no doubt that Peter Griest, by his last will and testament, bequeathed this money, so far as he possibly could do so, to his surviving wife, Eliza; and as we held in the other case above referred to that the money must be treated as part of [18 P. 655] the estate, we think that the court below was right in distributing it according to the will.

         Order appealed from affirmed.


Summaries of

In re Estate of Griest

Supreme Court of California
Jun 9, 1888
76 Cal. 497 (Cal. 1888)
Case details for

In re Estate of Griest

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of PETER GRIEST, Deceased

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jun 9, 1888

Citations

76 Cal. 497 (Cal. 1888)
18 P. 654

Citing Cases

Bowman v. Moore

If the substitution was effective, they are entitled to hold the money as against the claim of the plaintiff.…

Benson v. Benson

" See In re Griest's Estate (Cal.) 18 P. 654; Lockett v. Lockett (Ky.) 80 S.W. 1152; Harden v. Harden (Ky.)…