From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Erick Stickney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 20, 2010
73 A.D.3d 1356 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 507738.

May 20, 2010.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Erick Stickney, Moravia, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Lahtinen, Malone Jr. and McCarthy, JJ.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Medina v Selsky, 28 AD3d 898, 898; Matter of Jova v Goord, 27 AD3d 805, 806).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with a refund of the mandatory surcharge in the amount of $5.


Summaries of

In re Erick Stickney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 20, 2010
73 A.D.3d 1356 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Erick Stickney

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ERICK STICKNEY, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 20, 2010

Citations

73 A.D.3d 1356 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 4296
899 N.Y.S.2d 917

Citing Cases

Shepherd v. Fischer

Given that petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the…