From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ennis, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Oct 31, 2011
No. 05-11-01426-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 31, 2011)

Opinion

No. 05-11-01426-CV

Opinion issued October 31, 2011.

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. CC-09-00032-D.

Before Justices MORRIS, FRANCIS, and MYERS.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relator contends the trial judge erred in determining that California law would apply to the non-competition clause of an employment contract. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown it is entitled to the relief requested. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator's petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Ennis, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Oct 31, 2011
No. 05-11-01426-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 31, 2011)
Case details for

In re Ennis, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ENNIS, INC., Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Oct 31, 2011

Citations

No. 05-11-01426-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 31, 2011)

Citing Cases

Ennis, Inc. v. Dunbrooke Apparel Corp.

Ennis sought mandamus relief from this ruling, which we denied. See In re Ennis, Inc., No. 05–11–01426–CV,…