From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ebay Seller Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Oct 28, 2009
C 07-1882 JF (RS) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2009)

Opinion


IN RE EBAY SELLER ANTITRUST LITIGATION No. C 07-1882 JF (RS) United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. October 28, 2009

          ORDER (1) AMENDING OCTOBER 20, 2009, ORDER AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

This disposition is not designated for publication in the official reports.

          JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge.

         On October 20, 2009, the Court entered an order making a list of exhibits to Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendant eBay's motion for summary judgment part of the public record. On October 21, 2009, eBay filed a motion to alter or amend the October 20 order, or, in the alternative, for leave to file a motion for reconsideration. On October 26, 2009, Plaintiffs filed a response to eBay's October 21 motions.

         The parties agree that exhibits 79, 80, and 84 should be sealed. Accordingly, the Court will amend its October 20 order to seal those three exhibits.

         With respect to the remaining exhibits subject to the October 20 order, the Court will grant eBay leave to file a motion for reconsideration. Such motion shall be filed on or before November 4, 2009. Plaintiffs shall file their response, if any, on or before November 11, 2009. eBay shall file its reply, if any, on or before November 18, 2009. The motion thereupon will be submitted without oral argument.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Ebay Seller Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Oct 28, 2009
C 07-1882 JF (RS) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2009)
Case details for

In re Ebay Seller Antitrust Litigation

Case Details

Full title:IN RE EBAY SELLER ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Oct 28, 2009

Citations

C 07-1882 JF (RS) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2009)

Citing Cases

Spence v. Kaur

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, Plaintiff fails to present any showing whatsoever that the magistrate…

Spence v. Kaur

The objecting party has the burden of showing that the magistrate judge's ruling is clearly erroneous or…