Opinion
No. 04-09-00707-CR
Delivered and Filed: November 11, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH.
Original Mandamus Proceeding. Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied.
This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CR-1785, styled The State of Texas v. Josephus Duncan, pending in the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Philip Kazen presiding.
Sitting: KAREN ANGELINI, Justice, REBECCA SIMMONS, Justice, MARIALYN BARNARD, Justice.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Josephus Duncan has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the trial court to rule on his pro se "Motion in Limine — Enhancement Counts" and "Motion to Set Aside Indictment." However, Duncan is represented by retained counsel in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court for which he is currently confined. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). A trial court has no legal duty to rule on a pro se motion filed with regard to a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by counsel. Id. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to rule on relator's pro se motions that relate directly to his confinement based on the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).