From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Dove

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Dec 5, 2019
NO. 14-19-00944-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 5, 2019)

Opinion

NO. 14-19-00944-CR

12-05-2019

IN RE DAMON KENDRICK DOVE, Relator


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS
268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 12-DCR-061181-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 4, 2019, relator Damon Kendrick Dove filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Beverly McGrew Walker, Fort Bend County District Clerk, to order the State to take action in response to relator's motion for post-conviction DNA testing by either delivering the evidence to be tested to the trial court or explaining why the state cannot deliver such evidence.

This court's mandamus jurisdiction is governed by section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code. A court of appeals may issue writs of mandamus against (1) a judge of a district, statutory county, statutory probate county, or county court in the court of appeals district; (2) a judge of a district court who is acting as a magistrate at a court of inquiry under Chapter 52 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure in the court of appeals district; or (3) an associate judge of a district or county court appointed by a judge under Chapter 201 of the Texas Family Code in the court of appeals district for the judge who appointed the associate judge. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(b). The courts of appeals also may issue all writs necessary to enforce the court of appeals' jurisdiction. Id. § 22.221(a).

The Fort Bend County District Clerk is not among the parties specified in section 22.221(b). Id. § 22.221(b). Moreover, relator has not shown that the issuance of a writ compelling the requested relief is necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See id. § 22.221(a). Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against the Fort Bend County District Clerk. Even if we did have jurisdiction, relator cites no authority that would allow the district clerk to order the State to take the requested action, and we are unaware of any such authority.

Accordingly, we dismiss relator's petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

In re Dove

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Dec 5, 2019
NO. 14-19-00944-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 5, 2019)
Case details for

In re Dove

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DAMON KENDRICK DOVE, Relator

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 5, 2019

Citations

NO. 14-19-00944-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 5, 2019)