From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Disqualification of Grossman

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 6, 1996
77 Ohio St. 3d 1246 (Ohio 1996)

Opinion

No. 96-AP-077

Decided June 6, 1996.

ON AFFIDAVIT OF DISQUALIFICATION in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division case No. F-951987.


Richard Robinson has filed a second affidavit seeking the disqualification of Judge David E. Grossman from further proceedings in this case. The earlier affidavit of disqualification was found not well taken and denied. In re Disqualification of Grossman (May 7, 1996), No. 96-AP-063, unreported.

In this affidavit, affiant contends that Judge Grossman is disqualified "under the law" from presiding over a contempt of court proceeding involving an order issued by the judge. Judges are vested with inherent authority to issue contempt citations to compel obedience with court orders. The mere fact that a judge issues an order does not disqualify that judge from future proceedings designed to ensure compliance with that order.

Accordingly, the affidavit of disqualification is found not well taken and is denied. The case shall proceed before Judge Grossman.


Summaries of

In re Disqualification of Grossman

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 6, 1996
77 Ohio St. 3d 1246 (Ohio 1996)
Case details for

In re Disqualification of Grossman

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DISQUALIFICATION OF GROSSMAN. IN RE ROBINSON ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 6, 1996

Citations

77 Ohio St. 3d 1246 (Ohio 1996)
674 N.E.2d 357

Citing Cases

State v. Clark (In re Rickett)

It is well settled that "[j]udges are vested with inherent authority to issue contempt citations to compel…

State v. Clark (In re Rickett)

It is well settled that "[j]udges are vested with inherent authority to issue contempt citations to compel…