Opinion
In bank.
This was a motion for a new trial of the case of In re Tyler, 12 P. 289, which was heard before the supreme court of California, December 3, 1886, when said attorney was disbarred by the judgment of the supreme court.
ATTORNEYS— DISBARMENT BY SUPREME COURT— MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL.
Where the supreme court has, by its judgment, disbarred an attorney, a motion for a new trial will not be heard by it.
COUNSEL
Pillsbury & Blanding, for complaint.
James Crittenden, for respondent, Tyler.
OPINION
THE COURT.
The motion for a new trial is not the proper remedy in this cause. Considered as a petition for a rehearing, we see no reason to grant it.
Motion for a new trial and a rehearing denied.