From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re DeSeno

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jul 10, 2009
200 N.J. 201 (N.J. 2009)

Opinion

July 10, 2009.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 08-367, concluding that THOMAS DeSENO of MANASQUAN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.4(b) and (c) (failure to communicate with client), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with ethics authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS DeSENO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re DeSeno

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jul 10, 2009
200 N.J. 201 (N.J. 2009)
Case details for

In re DeSeno

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS DeSENO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jul 10, 2009

Citations

200 N.J. 201 (N.J. 2009)
976 A.2d 380

Citing Cases

In re Whitney

See, e.g., In re Perdue, 240 N.J. 43 (2019); In the Matter ofM. Blake Perdue, DRB 18-319, DRB 18-320, and DRB…