Accordingly, Plaintiff has failed to meet his burden of proof in opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Celotex v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323-24, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2553 (1986); Cifarelli v. Village of Babylon, 93 F.2d 47, 51 (2d Cir. 1996) ("[M] ere conclusory allegations, speculation or conjecture will not avail a party resisting summary judgment."); Goenaqa v. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, 51 F.3d 14, 18 (2d Cir. 1995). It also appears that Plaintiff has not alleged that the municipal Defendants engaged in a pattern or practice of indifference to prisoners' medical needs, as required by Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York, 436 U.S. 658, 694, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 2037-38 (1978); Batista v. Rodriguez, 702 F.2d 393, 397 (2d Cir. 1983).