From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re De La Garza

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Jan 28, 2015
NUMBER 13-14-00703-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 28, 2015)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-14-00703-CV

01-28-2015

IN RE ADOLFO DE LA GARZA


On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.@); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Relator, Adolfo De La Garza, filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to quash a pre-suit deposition sought by the real parties in interest, Hugo Lizcano and Lidia Lizcano. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 202. This Court granted relator's motion for emergency relief, ordered a stay of the underlying proceedings, and requested that the real parties in interest file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus. This Court subsequently granted the parties' "Joint Motion to Abate Mandamus Proceeding" to allow the real parties in interest to file a motion with the trial court to dismiss the underlying case. Relator has now filed a "Status Report and Unopposed Motion to Dismiss." According to this pleading, relator seeks to dismiss this original proceeding on grounds that the trial court has dismissed the underlying trial court matters and relator no longer desires to prosecute this petition for writ of mandamus.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the unopposed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we REINSTATE this original proceeding. We LIFT the stay previously imposed in this case. We GRANT the motion to dismiss this original proceeding. See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) ("A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings."); State Bar of Tex. v. Gomez, 891 S.W.2d 243, 245 (Tex. 1994) (stating that, for a controversy to be justiciable, there must be a real controversy between the parties that will be actually resolved by the judicial relief sought). We DISMISS this original proceeding as moot. The parties to this original proceeding will each bear their own costs. All pending motions are DISMISSED as moot.

PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 28th day of January, 2015.


Summaries of

In re De La Garza

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Jan 28, 2015
NUMBER 13-14-00703-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 28, 2015)
Case details for

In re De La Garza

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ADOLFO DE LA GARZA

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Jan 28, 2015

Citations

NUMBER 13-14-00703-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 28, 2015)