From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Davis

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2016
144 A.D.3d 1307 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

11-10-2016

In the Matter of the Claim of Joanne James DAVIS, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Joanne James Davis, Bellows Falls, Vermont, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Steven Koton of counsel), for respondent.


Joanne James Davis, Bellows Falls, Vermont, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Steven Koton of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 13, 2015, which dismissed claimant's appeal from a decision of the Administrative Law Judge as untimely.

By decision dated August 18, 2014, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ), among other things, sustained an initial determination finding that claimant was ineligible to receive emergency unemployment compensation benefits and charging her with a recoverable overpayment of benefits. Claimant did not appeal the ALJ's decision to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board until June 14, 2015. The Board dismissed the appeal as untimely, noting that claimant did not set forth any excuse for the delay. Claimant appeals.

“Labor Law § 621(1) provides that an appeal to the Board from a decision of an ALJ must be made within 20 days of the mailing or personal delivery of the decision, and this time requirement is strictly construed” (Matter of Buchkin [Commissioner of Labor], 115 A.D.3d 1107, 1108, 982 N.Y.S.2d 199 [2014] [citations omitted];

see Matter of Paladino [Commissioner of Labor], 140 A.D.3d 1496, 1496–1497, 34 N.Y.S.3d 270 [2016] ). Claimant clearly did not appeal within the statutory time period and offered no excuse for the delay. As such, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision (see Matter of Stephens [Commissioner of Labor], 119 A.D.3d 1258, 1259, 989 N.Y.S.2d 409 [2014] ). Accordingly, the merits of the underlying determination are not properly before us (see Matter of Padilla [Commissioner of Labor], 136 A.D.3d 1080, 1081, 23 N.Y.S.3d 915 [2016] ; Matter of Matteo [Commissioner of Labor], 134 A.D.3d 1307, 1307, 20 N.Y.S.3d 915 [2015] ).

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

PETERS, P.J., McCARTHY, ROSE, MULVEY and AARONS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Davis

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2016
144 A.D.3d 1307 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

In re Davis

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of Joanne James DAVIS, Appellant. Commissioner…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 10, 2016

Citations

144 A.D.3d 1307 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 7387
40 N.Y.S.3d 304

Citing Cases

Watts v. Comm'r Labor

. Claimant did not appeal to the Board within the statutorily-prescribed time period, nor has he offered any…

Tracy v. Comm'r of Lab.

Claimant’s appeal was submitted over a year after the ALJ’s decision and she provided no excuse for the…