From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd., L.L.P.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Aug 19, 2005
193 S.W.3d 580 (Tex. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 05-05-01034-CV.

August 19, 2005.

Original Proceeding from the 116th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 03-02664-F, Robert Frost, Judge.

David Watkins, Kevin Robinowitz, W. Carson Croft, Jenkins Watkins, P.C., Dallas, for Relator.

Jeffrey C. Mateer, Randel Craig Shaffer, Mateer Schaffer, P.C., Dallas, for Real Party In Interest.

Before Justices WRIGHT, O'NEILL, and LANG.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relator contends the trial judge abused his discretion in denying relator's plea in abatement and motion to stay proceedings and compel arbitration. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown the trial judge clearly abused his discretion. See TEX.R.APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-44 (Tex. 1992) (orig.proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator's petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd., L.L.P.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Aug 19, 2005
193 S.W.3d 580 (Tex. App. 2005)
Case details for

In re Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd., L.L.P.

Case Details

Full title:In re DALLAS PETERBILT, LTD., L.L.P., Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Aug 19, 2005

Citations

193 S.W.3d 580 (Tex. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

In re Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd., L.L.P.

PER CURIAM. In this original proceeding, relator Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd., L.L.P. seeks to compel arbitration…