From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Customs and Tax Administration of Kingdom of Denmark (Ska Tteforvaltningen) Tax Refund Scheme Litigation

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 25, 2021
18-md-02865-LAK (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 25, 2021)

Opinion

18-md-02865-LAK

06-25-2021

In re CUSTOMS AND TAX ADMINISTRATION OF THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK (SKA TTEFORVALTNINGEN) TAX REFUND SCHEME LITIGATION This document relates to: All Cases.


REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE PURSUANT TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 18 MARCH 1970 ON THE TAKING OF EVIDENCE ABROAD IN CIVIL OR COMMERCIAL MATTERS

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York presents its compliments to the appropriate judicial authority of the Kingdom of Denmark, and requests international judicial assistance to obtain evidence to be used in a civil proceeding before this court in the above captioned matter. This request is made pursuant to and in conformity with the Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters.

This Court requests the assistance described herein as necessary in the interests of justice. The assistance requested is for the appropriate judicial authority of Denmark to compel the below-named individual to provide testimony.

This Court considers that the evidence sought is directly relevant to issues of fact and law that may influence the final determination of the existence, non-existence, and/or extent of any liability in this matter. This request is made with the understanding that it will in no way require any person to commit any offense, or to undergo a broader form of inquiry than they would if the litigation were conducted in the Kingdom of Denmark. It is expected, based on existing timetables, that the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York may schedule trial in or around 2021. Potential summary judgment motions would be due before trial. In the United States, parties may move for summary judgment. A party moving for or opposing summary judgment must present evidence to support its arguments, as they do at trial. The following request is made in support of the pending proceedings in New York.

The particulars of this Hague Evidence Request are as follows:

1. Sender

The Honorable Lewis A. Kaplan District Judge United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

2. Central Authority of the Requested State

Ministry of Justice Procedural Law Division Slotsholmsgade 10 1216 COPENHAGEN K Denmark

3. Person to whom the executed request is to be returned

Sharon L. McCarthy Kostelanetz & Fink, LLP 7 World Trade Center, 34th Floor New York, NY 10007 Tel.: (212) 808-8100 Fax: (212) 808-8108 Email: smccarthy@kflaw.com

4. Specification of the day by which the requesting authority requires receipt of the response to the Letter of Request Date

04/30/21

Reason for Urgency, if applicable

Discovery is underway in this matter and trial may be scheduled to occur in 2021.

IN CONFORMITY WITH ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION, THE UNDERSIGNED APPLICANT HAS THE HONOR TO SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING REQUEST:

5a. Requesting judicial authority (Article 3, a)

The Honorable Lewis A. Kaplan District Judge United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

5b. To the competent authority of (Article 3, a)

The Kingdom of Denmark

5c. Names of the case and any identifying number

In re Customs and Tax Administration of the Kingdom of Denmark (SKAT) Tax Refund Scheme Litigation, l 8-md- 2865 (LAK)

6. Names and addresses of the parties and their representatives

a. Plaintiff

SKAT 0stbancgade 123 2200 K0benhavn 0 Denmark

Representatives

William R. Maguire Marc A. Weinstein Neil J. Oxford Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP One Battery Park Plaza New York, New York 10004-1482 United States of America

b. Defendants

Please refer to the attached Appendix A

Representatives

Please refer to the attached Appendix A

7. Nature of the Proceedings

a. Background

In May and June 2018, Plaintiff SKAT filed 140 similar complaints in eleven different federal judicial districts. On October 3, 2018, the federal complaints were consolidated in this Multi-District Litigation (“MDL”) and assigned to the Honorable Lewis A. Kaplan. Since that time, SKAT filed several additional complaints which are consolidated into the MDL. SKAT filed amended complaints on April 20, 2020, against the particular Defendants seeking the evidence described below. Defendants answered the amended complaints on June 29, 2020.

Defendants are pension, profit sharing, or stock bonus plans qualified under section 401(a) of the United States Internal Revenue Code, exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the United States Internal Revenue Code, and residents of the United States of America for purposes of U.S. taxation. Defendants applied for and received dividend tax reclaims from Plaintiff SKAT related to Defendants' ownership of shares in Danish companies listed on the OMX Copenhagen 20 Index, the 20 most-traded stocks in Denmark. Danish companies are required to withhold 27% tax on dividends they pay to shareholders. Under certain double taxation treaties between Denmark and other countries, including the United States, this tax is reimbursable to certain non-Danish shareholders, including pension, profit sharing, and stock bonus plans qualified under section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. Defendants, acting through their agents and representatives, applied to SKAT claiming repayments of tax withheld on dividends that they earned on shares of Danish companies that they held. SKAT claims that Defendants did not own the shares forming the basis of those tax reclaim applications. SKAT alleges that it paid baseless withholding tax refund claims.

The witness whose testimony is sought pursuant to this Letter of Request is a former SKAT employee named Jette Zester.

b. Summary of Complaints

The allegations in Plaintiff SKAT's complaints in the consolidated actions are substantially similar. SKAT brought complaints against three classes of defendants: “Plan Defendants, ” the pension plans that SKAT claims received baseless dividend withholding tax refunds; “Authorized Representative Defendants, ” individuals who signed powers of attorney authorizing Payment Agents to submit dividend withholding tax refund claims to SKAT; and “Incorporator Defendants, ” defendants who incorporated business entities associated with the Plan Defendants that submitted dividend withholding tax refund claims to SKAT. The conduct at the heart of Plaintiff SKAT's complaints is alleged to have occurred between 2012 and 2015. Plaintiff asserts claims for fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, payment by mistake, unjust enrichment, negligent misrepresentation, and related claims.

c. Summary of Defenses

Defendants deny all allegations of wrongdoing made by SKAT. Defendants assert numerous defenses to SKAT's allegations. Defendants maintain that they acted at all times reasonably and with due care, reasonably relied upon the actions and statements of others, and did not directly or indirectly cause, induce, aid, or abet any acts constituting the claims asserted by SKAT. Defendants assert that they did not engage in any unlawful conduct and are not liable for any unlawful acts that may have been committed by others. Furthermore, Defendants contend that if SKAT suffered any loss, damage, or injury, such alleged loss, damage, or injury was caused in whole or in part by SKAT's own negligence, SKAT's assumption of risk, and/or other culpable parties and/or third parties to this action, other than Defendants, for whose acts or omissions or breaches of legal duty Defendants are not liable. Finally, Defendants allege that SKAT's claims are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations.

d. Other Necessary Information or Documents

8a. Evidence to be obtained or other judicial act to be performed (Article 3, d)

Defendants seek testimony from Jette Zester

8b. Purpose of the evidence or other judicial act sought

The witness's testimony is relevant to establishing one or more of Defendants' defenses in this action.

9. Identity and address of any person to be examined (Article 3, e)

Jette Zester was a special consultant at SKAT from at least 2002 through 2013. Jette Zester may be found at Blovstrodvej 51, 3450 Allerod

10. Questions to be put to the person to be examined or statement of the subject-matter about which they are to be examined (Article 3, f)

a. Definitions

i. “SKAT" - Skatteforvaltningcn and any officers, directors, managers, employees, or agents thereof.

ii. “Ministry” - the Danish Ministry of Taxation.

iii. “Tenure" - the period of time from approximately 2002 forward, during which time Jette Zester was employed by SKAT.

iv. “Minister" - Minister of Taxation for Denmark.

v. “Risk” any likelihood that SKAT issued an Erroneous Refund of dividend taxes.

vi. “Erroneous Refund” - a refund of dividend tax issued to an applicant not eligible to receive such refund.

vii. “Control” - any policy, procedure, directive, or other rule that would have increased the information reported to SKAT, provided SKAT with greater ability to assess the validity of any individual dividend tax reclaim application, or decreased Risk.

viii. “Problemkatalog” - a memorandum prepared by Jette Zester and Lisbeth Romer in approximately 2006 outlining various control gaps and proposed solutions thereto in connection with SKAT's administration of dividend taxes.

ix. “Reclaim Agent” - any of Goal Group, Syntax G1S, or Acupay, which firms submitted dividend reclaim applications on behalf of shareholders.

b. Subject of Testimony

The subject of Jette Zester's testimony will be:

i. The identities and responsibilities of all SKAT employees with responsibility for any component of dividend tax administration during her Tenure;

ii. The organizational structure within SKAT, including the management chain of command, and any changes to that structure during her Tenure;

iii. Her knowledge that SKAT lacked the ability to independently verify the ownership of stocks associated with reclaim applications;

iv. Her knowledge that SKAT lacked the ability to independently verify whether dividend taxes had in fact been withheld with respect to such stocks identified in a reclaim application;

v. Her knowledge of the schedule and process for reporting of dividend payment information to SKAT;

vi. Her knowledge that SKAT was issuing Erroneous Refunds;

vii. Her knowledge regarding the volume of dividend tax refunds issued by SKAT;

viii. Her knowledge regarding the volume of Erroneous Refunds issued by SKAT;

ix. The facts known to SKAT in connection with a 2006 dividend reclaim application submitted by Bankers Trust Opera Trading and related to shares in TDC;

x. The specific factual concerns raised by any SKAT employee and related to Bankers Trust Opera Trading's dividend reclaim application;

xi. Her knowledge of all other conditions contributing to Risk;

xii. All communications with SKAT or other Ministry of Taxation officials concerning Risk, including but not limited to the Problemkatalog and any drafts thereof or predecessor memoranda;

xiii. Meetings she attended with SKAT, Ministry, or Danish Bankers Association members to discuss Controls;

xiv. Her response to any communication, whether written or oral, identifying, discussing, or warning of any Risk;

xv. All Controls proposed during her Tenure;

xvi. The extent and impact of resource constraints within SKAT and their effect on dividend tax administration;

xvii. Her understanding of the prevailing political trends in Denmark and the challenges they presented to implementing Control measures;

xviii. The factual and legal basis for the Problemkatalog;

xix. The efforts to seek ministerial approval of an order changing the dividend reporting deadline so that it was closer in time to SKAT's payment of dividend refunds and her understanding of why it took years for that order to be executed; and xx. Authentication of documents if necessary.

11. Documents or other property to be inspected (Article 3, g)

Any and all contemporaneous notes, memoranda, testimony, or correspondence in the possession, custody or control of Jette Zester related to the Subject of Testimony.

12. Any requirement that the evidence be given on oath or affirmation and any special form to be used (Article 3, h)

The examinations shall be taken under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure of the United States of America, except to the extent such procedure is incompatible with the law of the Kingdom of Denmark. The testimony shall be given under oath.

13. Special methods or procedure to be followed (Articles 3, i and 9)

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York respectfully requests that: a. The Parties' United States and Danish lawyers be permitted to attend the oral testimony and ask supplementary questions of the witness; b. The Parties' United States and Danish lawyers be permitted to examine and cross-examine the witnesses directly; c. The Parties' United States and Danish lawyers be allowed to participate in the oral testimony of the requested witnesses by video-conference per the enclosed 'Optional Form For Video-Link Evidence,' as practicable and in discussion with the Ministry of Justice regarding technical logistics and that the videoconference be recorded and a copy provided to the Parties; Oral testimony of the witnesses be videotaped and recorded verbatim, and that a professional videographer and a professional stenographer be permitted to attend the oral testimony in order to record the testimony; the costs of the court reporter or of the videographer being at the charge of defendants

14. Request for notification of the time and place for the execution of the Request and person to be notified (Article 7)

It is requested that testimony be taken at such place, date or time as ordered by the Ministry of Justice and/or as otherwise scheduled by the representatives of the identity and address of any Defendants and/or as otherwise agreed to by the witnesses and the respective representatives of the Parties. Notice thereof should be made to Defendants' Danish designee: Kasper Bech Pilgaard TVC Law Firm Nimbusparkcn 24, 2d fl., 2000 Fredcriksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark

15. Request for attendance or participation of judicial personnel of the requesting authority at the execution of the Letter of Request (Article 8)

None.

16. Specification of privilege or duty to refuse to give evidence under the law of the State of origin (Article 1 l, b)

Under the laws of the United States, a party has a privilege to refuse to disclose the contents of a confidential communication between that party and an attorney that was made for the purpose of obtaining legal advice. Waiver of the privilege over some communications, in some circumstances, can be deemed a waiver of privilege over other communications concerning the same subject matter. Parties also enjoy limited privileges not relevant here, such as communications between physician and patient, psychotherapist and patient, husband and wife, or clergy and penitent. United States law also recognizes a testimonial privilege against criminal self-incrimination. This privilege does not apply to production of documents. Outside the strict area of privilege, certain limited immunities are available that may place restrictions on the giving of evidence, such as the limited protection of documents created by attorneys in anticipation of litigation.

17. The fees and costs incurred which are reimbursable under the second paragraph of Article 14 or under Article 26 of the Convention will be borne by

Defendants

APPENDIX A

Defendants

Counsel

Associated Case(s)

John van Merkensteijn, III

Sharon L. McCarthy Caroline Ciraolo Nicholas S. Bahnsen Kostelanetz & Fink LLP 7 World Trade Center, 34th Floor New York, New York 10007 Tel: (212) 808-8100 Fax:(212)808-8108

19-CV-01866 19-cv-01865 19-cv-01906 19-cv-01894 19-cv-0191119-cv-0187119- cv-01930 19-cv-01873 19-cv-01794 19-cv-01798 19-cv-01788 19-cv-01918 19-cv-01928 19-cv-0193119-CV-01800 19-cv-01803 19-cv-01809 19-CV-01818 19-cv-0180119-CV-01810 19-cv-01813

Elizabeth van Merkensteijn

19-cv-01893

Azalea Pension Plan

19-cv-01893

Basalt Ventures LLC Roth 401(K)Plan

19-cv-01866

Bernina Pension Plan

19-cv-01865

Bernina Pension Plan Trust

19-cv-10713

Michelle Investments Pension Plan

19-cv-01906

Omineca Pension Plan

19-cv-01894

Omineca Trust

19-cv-0 1794 19-cv-0 1798 19-cv-0 1788 19-cv-0 1918 19-cv-01928 19-cv-0 193119-CV-01800 19-cv-01803 19-cv-01809 19-cv-01818 19-cv-0180119-cv-01810 19-cv-01813

Remece Investments LLC Pension Plan

19-cv-01911

Starfish Capital Management LLC Roth 401(K)Plan

19-cv-01871

Tarvos Pension Plan

19-cv-01930

Voojo Productions LLC Roth 40 ](K) Plan

19-cv-01873

Xiphias LLC Pension Plan

19-cv-0I924

Richard Markowitz

Alan E. Schoenfield Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 7 World Trade Center 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 Telephone: (212) 230-8800 alan.sehoenfeld@wilmerhale.com

I9-cv-01867 19-cv-01895 19-cv-01869 19-CV-01868 19-cv-01898 19-cv-10713 19-cv-01896 19-cv-01783 19-cv-01922 19-cv-01926 19-cv-01929 19-cv-01812 19-cv-01870 19-cv-01792 19-cv-01806 19-cv-01808 19-cv-01815

Jocelyn Markowitz

19-cv-01904

Avanix Management LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

19-cv-01867

Batavia Capital Pension Plan

19-CV-01895

Calypso Investments Pension Plan

19-cv-01904

Cavus Systems LLC Roth 401(K)Plan

19-cv-01869

Hadron Industries LLC Roth 401(K)Plan

19-CV-01868

RJM Capital Pension Plan

19-cv-01898

RJM Capital Pension Plan Trust

19-cv-10713

Routt Capital Pension Plan

19-cv-01896

Routt Capital Trust

19-cv-01783 19-CV-01922 19-cv-01926 19-cv-01929 19-CV-01812 19-cv-01870 19-cv-01792 19-cv-01806 19-CV-01808 19-cv-01815

Rob Klugman RAK Investment Trust

Mark D. Allison Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered 600 Lexington Avenue 21st Floor New York, NY 10022 Tel: (212) 379-6000 mallison@capdale.com zziering@eapdale.com

18-cv-07828 18-cv-07827 18-cv-07824 18-cv-07829 18-cv-04434

Aerovane Logistics LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

18-cv-07828

Edgepoint Capital LLC Roth 401(K)Plan

18-cv-07827

Headsail Manufacturing LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

18-cv-07824

The Random Holdings 401(K)Plan

18-cv-07829

The Stor Capital Consulting LLC 401(K) Plan

18-cv-04434

Joseph Herman

Michelle A. Rice Kaplan Rice LLP 142 West 57th Street Suite 4A

1:19-cv-01785 1:19-cv-017811:19-cv-017911:19- cv-01794

David Zelman

New York N.Y. 10019 (212)333-0227

1:19-cv-01918 1:19-cv-01783 1:19-cv-01798 1:19-cv-01788

Edwin Miller

1:19-cv-01926 1:19-cv-01922 1:19-cv-01928 1:19-cv-01929 1:19-cv-01931

Ronald Altbach

1:19-cv-01809 1:19-cv-01800 1:19-cv-01803 1:19-cv-01812 1:19-cv-01818

Perry Lerner

1:19-cv-01806 1:19-cv-01870 1:19-cv-01792 1:19-cv-01808 1:19-cv-01815

Robin Jones

1:19-cv-018011:19-cv-01810 1:19-cv-01813

Ballast Ventures LLC Roth 401(K)Plan

1:19-cv-01781

Bareroot Capital Investments LLC Roth 401(K)Plan

1:19-cv-01783

Albedo Management LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

1:19-cv-01785

Dicot Technologies LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

1:19-cv-01788

Fairlie Investments LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

1:19-cv-01791

First Ascent Worldwide LLC Roth 401 (K) Plan

1:19-cv-01792

Battu Holdings LLC Roth 401(K)Plan"

1:19-cv-01794

Cantata Industries LLC Roth 401(K)Plan

1:19-cv-01798

Crucible Ventures LLC Roth 401 (K) Plan

1.T9-cv-01800

Monomer Industries LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

1:19-cv-01801

Limelight Global Productions LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

1:19-cv-01803

Loggerhead Services LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

1:19-cv-01806

PAB Facilities Global LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

1:19-cv-01808

Plumrose Industries LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

1:19-cv-01809

Pinax Holdings LLC Roth 401(K)Plan

1:19-cv-01810

Roadcraft Technologies LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

1:19-cv-01812

Sternway Logistics LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

1:19-cv-01813

Trailing Edge Productions LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

1:19-cv-01815

True Wind Investments LLC Roth401(K) Plan

1:19-cv-01818

Eelouge Industry LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

1:19-cv-01870

Vanderlee Technologies Pension Plan

1:19-cv-0I918

Vanderlee Technologies Pension Plan Trust

1:19-cv-01918

Cedar Hill Capital Investments LLC Roth 401(K)Plan

1:19-cv-01922

Green Scale Management LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

1:19-cv-01926

Fulcrum Productions LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

1:19-cv-01928

Keystone Technologies LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

1:19-cv-01929

Tumba Systems LLC Roth 401(K) Plan

1:19-cv-01931

Sander Gerber Sander Gerber Pension Plan

Stephen D. Andrews Amy B. McKinlay Williams & Connolly LLP 725 Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20005 (202)434-5000 amekinlay(a), we.com.sandrews@we.com

18-cv-4899 18-cv-4899

Michael Ben-Jacob

Thomas E. L. Dewey Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky LLP 777 Third Avenue - 37th Floor New York, New York 10017 Tel.: (212) 943-9000 Fax:(212)943-4325 E-mai1: tdewey@dpklaw.co

1:18-cv-04434 1:18-cv-07824 1:18-cv-07827 1:18-cv-07828 1: 8-cv-07829 1: 19-cv-0 17811: 19-cv-0 1783 1: 19-cv-0 1785 1:19-cv-01788 1:19-cv-01791 I:19-cv-0 1 792 1:19-cv-0 1 794 1:19-cv-01798 1:19-cv-0 1800 1:1 9-cv-0 18011:19-cv-0 1803 1:19-cv-0 1806 1:19-cv-0 1808 I: 19-cv-0 1809 1: 19-cv-01810 1: 19-cv-01812 l:19-cv-01813 1:19-cv-01815 1: 19-cv-0 1818 1: 19-cv-01866 1: 19-cv-01867 1:19-cv-0 1868 1:19-cv-0 1869 1: 19-cv-0 1870 1: 19-cv-018711: 19-cv-0 1873 1: 19-cv-0 1894 1: 19-cv-01896 1:19-cv-0 1918 1:19-cv-0 1922 1:19-cv-0 1926 1: 19-cv-01928 1:19-cv-01929 1:19-cv-0 1931

Acer Investment Group LLC

John C. Blessington K&L GATES LLP State Street Financial Center One Lincoln Street Boston, MA 02111 T: 617.261.3100 F: 617.261.3175 E: john.bkssingto@wklgatcs.com

18-cv-0984118-CV-09797 18-cv-09836 18-cv-09837 18-cv-09838 18-cv-09839 18-cv-09840 18-cv-lOlOO 18-cv-05053

American Investment Group of New York, L.P. Pension Plan

18-cv-09841

DW Construction, Inc. Retirement Plan

18-cv-09797

Kamco Investments Inc. Pension Plan

18-cv-09836

Kamco LP Profit Sharing Pension Plan

18-cv-09837

Linden Associates Defined Benefit Plan

18-cv-09838

Moira Associates LLC 401K Plan

18-cv-09839

Newsong Fellowship Church 40IK Plan

18-cv-10100

Riverside Associates Defined Benefit Plan

18-cv-09840

Robert Crema Stacey Kaminer

18-cv-09841

18-cv-0984118-CV-09797 18-cv-09836 18-cv-09837

Alexander Jamie Mitchell III

18-cv-09839

David Schulman

18-cv-10100

Joan Schulman

18-cv-09840

Darren Wittwer

18-cv-09838 18-cv-09797

Sheldon Goldstein Scott Goldstein The Goldstein Law Group PC 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan

Martin H. Kaplan Kari Parks Gusrae Kaplan Nusbaum PLLC 120 Wall Street New York, NY 10005 T:(212) 269-1400 mkaplan@gusraekaplan, com kparks@gusraekaplan.com

18-cv-5053


Summaries of

In re Customs and Tax Administration of Kingdom of Denmark (Ska Tteforvaltningen) Tax Refund Scheme Litigation

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 25, 2021
18-md-02865-LAK (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 25, 2021)
Case details for

In re Customs and Tax Administration of Kingdom of Denmark (Ska Tteforvaltningen) Tax Refund Scheme Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In re CUSTOMS AND TAX ADMINISTRATION OF THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK (SKA…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 25, 2021

Citations

18-md-02865-LAK (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 25, 2021)