From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re C.S.

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division
Jan 15, 2009
No. B208468 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 15, 2009)

Opinion


In re C.S., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. C.S., Defendant and Appellant. B208468 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Eighth Division January 15, 2009

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Super. Ct. No. FJ39113, Robert Totten, Commissioner.

Jean Ballentine, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

FLIER, J.

A juvenile court petition, filed on April 2, 2008, alleged that 17-year-old C.S. should be made a ward of the court because he committed a second degree robbery.

On April 17, 2008, C.S. was ordered detained at juvenile hall.

The adjudication hearing occurred on May 19, 2008. The evidence showed that C.S. and an accomplice approached R.G. at a bus stop and forced him to give up $3 and an iPod. The juvenile court sustained the petition and proceeded immediately to disposition. It placed C.S. in the Camp Community Placement program for six months, with a recommendation of “fire camp” or “forestry.” It added 130 hours of community service and set the maximum commitment time at 10 years four months.

The following day, C.S. filed a notice of appeal. His appointed counsel filed a brief with this court pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). Counsel successfully obtained from the juvenile court a correction of the May 19, 2008 minute order, to show 90 days of predisposition credit. C.S. was notified that he could file his own brief, and has not done so.

From our review of the record, we are satisfied that C.S.’s counsel on appeal has fully complied with her responsibilities, and no arguable issues exist. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259; Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 123-124.)

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

We concur: RUBIN, Acting P. J. O’NEILL, J.

Judge of the Ventura County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.


Summaries of

In re C.S.

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division
Jan 15, 2009
No. B208468 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 15, 2009)
Case details for

In re C.S.

Case Details

Full title:In re C.S., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division

Date published: Jan 15, 2009

Citations

No. B208468 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 15, 2009)