From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Cougot

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District
Sep 15, 2021
No. 10-21-00221-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 15, 2021)

Opinion

10-21-00221-CV

09-15-2021

IN RE RHONDA LEE COUGOT


Original Proceeding

From the County Court at Law Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 9276PR

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith.

(Chief Justice Gray dissents. A separate opinion will not issue. Chief Justice Gray notes, however that he would grant the emergency motion seeking a stay of the trial court proceedings, particularly the impending trial, and request a response with a view to granting the requested writ. If the testimony of the scrivener of the will as to communications with the deceased about the testator's intent is improperly protected from disclosure, the result of the trial on the meaning of that will is virtually guaranteed to be the result of harmful error if the Relator is otherwise unsuccessful in that trial. It would be hard to find any evidence that was more important or persuasive than the testimony of the decedent's attorney, other than possibly a video recording of the decedent. Therefore, for jurisprudential reasons, the time to address this question is before trial via mandamus, rather than in a direct appeal after the trial has been concluded. See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 136 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)).

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MATT JOHNSON JUSTICE.

Relator's Petition for Writ of Mandamus is denied. Relator's Motion for Emergency Stay is dismissed as moot.

Petition denied; motion dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Cougot

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District
Sep 15, 2021
No. 10-21-00221-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 15, 2021)
Case details for

In re Cougot

Case Details

Full title:IN RE RHONDA LEE COUGOT

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District

Date published: Sep 15, 2021

Citations

No. 10-21-00221-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 15, 2021)