From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Friend

Supreme Court of California.
Sep 1, 2021
12 Cal.5th 255 (Cal. 2021)

Opinion

No. S256914.

09-01-2021

In re JACK WAYNE FRIEND on Habeas Corpus.


On page 743 [11 Cal.5th 743, advance report, 2d par., line 3], in the first sentence of the second full paragraph, the phrase "the statute" is replaced with "section 1509(d)," so that the sentence reads:

Applying these principles, we conclude that when section 1509(d) is applied to a post-Proposition 66 petition subsequent to an initial pre-Proposition 66, post-Clark petition, section 1509(d) is not operating retroactively.

On page 743 [11 Cal.5th 743, advance report, 2d par., line 5], in the third sentence of the second full paragraph, the phrase "This provision of" is added at the beginning of the sentence, so that the sentence begins:

This provision of Proposition 66 underscores the importance of presenting available claims in the first petition....

This modification does not affect the judgment.


Summaries of

In re Friend

Supreme Court of California.
Sep 1, 2021
12 Cal.5th 255 (Cal. 2021)
Case details for

In re Friend

Case Details

Full title:In re JACK WAYNE FRIEND on Habeas Corpus.

Court:Supreme Court of California.

Date published: Sep 1, 2021

Citations

12 Cal.5th 255 (Cal. 2021)