From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Cook

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jul 21, 2020
No. 05-20-00205-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2020)

Opinion

No. 05-20-00205-CV

07-21-2020

IN RE BYRON CURTIS COOK, TRADE RARE, L.L.C., AND JOEL HOCHBERG, Relators


Original Proceeding from the 417th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 417-04885-2016

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Reichek
Opinion by Justice Bridges

Before the Court are relators' February 18, 2020 petition for writ of mandamus, real parties in interest's May 26, 2020 response, and relators' June 17, 2020 reply to the response. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relators have no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and mandamus record, we conclude relators have failed to show they are entitled to the relief requested.

Accordingly, we deny relators' petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

/David L. Bridges/

DAVID L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE 200205F.P05 Osborne, J., Dissenting


Summaries of

In re Cook

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jul 21, 2020
No. 05-20-00205-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2020)
Case details for

In re Cook

Case Details

Full title:IN RE BYRON CURTIS COOK, TRADE RARE, L.L.C., AND JOEL HOCHBERG, Relators

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jul 21, 2020

Citations

No. 05-20-00205-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2020)