From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Conner

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 13, 2018
2017-2232 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 13, 2018)

Opinion

2017-2232

06-13-2018

IN RE: JACOB CONNER, Appellant

MICHAEL KEITH BLANKENSHIP, Da Vinci's Notebook, LLC, Bristow, VA, argued for appellant. THOMAS L. CASAGRANDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, WILLIAM LAMARCA.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/962,328.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL KEITH BLANKENSHIP, Da Vinci's Notebook, LLC, Bristow, VA, argued for appellant. THOMAS L. CASAGRANDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, WILLIAM LAMARCA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, WALLACH and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 13, 2018

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Conner

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 13, 2018
2017-2232 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 13, 2018)
Case details for

In re Conner

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: JACOB CONNER, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 13, 2018

Citations

2017-2232 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 13, 2018)