From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Charles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 12, 2008
52 A.D.3d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

June 12, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered June 1, 2007, which denied respondent's motion to vacate an October 2006 default judgment and remanded the matter to respondent for calculation and award of present and past benefits to petitioner, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Buckley and Catterson, JJ.


Not only did respondent's paralegal "misplace" both the CPLR article 78 pleadings and the subsequent default judgment with notice of entry, but he twice provided false information as to the status of the case. Respondent presented no explanation for its failure to respond to numerous communications not addressed to the paralegal. The lack of a reasonable excuse for the default is sufficient by itself to mandate affirmance ( see Matter of Saunders v City of New York, 283 AD2d 213).


Summaries of

In re Charles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 12, 2008
52 A.D.3d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

In re Charles

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of R. CHARLES ROWND, Respondent, v. TEACHERS RETIREMENT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 12, 2008

Citations

52 A.D.3d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
859 N.Y.S.2d 190

Citing Cases

Torres v. Metro N. R.R.

B. Lack of a Meritorious Claim Although plaintiffs' lack of reasonable excuse for their pattern of neglect is…