From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Chaidez

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Jul 31, 2024
No. S285573 (Cal. Jul. 31, 2024)

Opinion

S285573

07-31-2024

CHAIDEZ (ROBERTO CHRISTIAN) ON H.C.


The petition for writ of habeas corpus has been read and considered. Petitioner contends, among other claims, that he is entitled to relief under the Racial Justice Act of 2020 (Pen. Code, § 745). In this respect, petitioner claims he has been denied access to the courts, the trial judge in his case was racist, a police officer planted evidence, and he and Mexican inmates are being held hostage. The petition fails to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to relief under the Racial Justice Act. (Pen. Code, § 1473, subd. (e).) The petition fails to allege particularized facts that adequately describe any alleged actions and how they reflected racial bias or animus. Nor does petitioner describe or attach supporting documentary evidence concerning racial bias or animus or the use of racially discriminatory language. (Pen. Code, § 745, subd. (a)(1)-(4); cf. In re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must allege sufficient facts with particularity]; cf. also People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably available documentary evidence].)

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Guerrero, C. J., was recused and did not participate.


Summaries of

In re Chaidez

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Jul 31, 2024
No. S285573 (Cal. Jul. 31, 2024)
Case details for

In re Chaidez

Case Details

Full title:CHAIDEZ (ROBERTO CHRISTIAN) ON H.C.

Court:California Supreme Court(Minute Order)

Date published: Jul 31, 2024

Citations

No. S285573 (Cal. Jul. 31, 2024)