From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Centocor, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jan 8, 2008
267 F. App'x 931 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2007-1192.

January 8, 2008.

Appealed from United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, No. 78/448,489.

Brian A. Coleman, Drinker, Biddle Reath LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Jaye S. Yung.

Christina J. Hieber, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, VA, argued for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With her on the brief were Stephen Walsh, Acting Solicitor, and Mary L. Kelly, Associate Solicitor.

MICHEL, Chief Judge, RADER and MOORE, Circuit Judges.


Judgment


This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

In re Centocor, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jan 8, 2008
267 F. App'x 931 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
Case details for

In re Centocor, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In re CENTOCOR, INC

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 8, 2008

Citations

267 F. App'x 931 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

In re Unisys Retiree Med. Bene. Erisa Lit.

See, e.g., In re Centocor, 1993 WL 189937, at *6 (no enhancement of lodestar warranted). Still, multipliers…