From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Caterpillar Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Dec 23, 2009
No. 04-09-00796-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 23, 2009)

Opinion

No. 04-09-00796-CV

Delivered and Filed: December 23, 2009.

Original Mandamus Proceeding.

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2007-CI-15864, styled Alfonso Lopez and Maria Elena Lopez v. Caterpillar, Inc. and Holt Texas, Ltd. d/b/a Holt Cat, pending in the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Gloria Saldana presiding. However, the ruling complained of was made by the Honorable Martha Tanner, presiding judge of the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied.

Sitting: KAREN ANGELINI, Justice, REBECCA SIMMONS, Justice, STEVEN C. HILBIG, Justice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On December 11, 2009, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial court's granting of the motion to strike the designation of a responsible third party. Mandamus will issue only to correct a clear abuse of discretion for which relators have no adequate remedy at law. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). The court has considered relators' petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relators are not entitled to the relief sought because they have an adequate remedy by appeal. See In re Scoggins Const. Co., No. 13-08-00317-CV, 2008 WL 2721181 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi June 30, 2008, orig. proceeding [mand. denied]) (mem. op.); In re Unitec Elevator Servs. Co., 178 S.W.3d 53, 64-65 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Caterpillar Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Dec 23, 2009
No. 04-09-00796-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 23, 2009)
Case details for

In re Caterpillar Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE CATERPILLAR INC. and HOLT TEXAS, LTD, d/b/a HOLT CAT

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Dec 23, 2009

Citations

No. 04-09-00796-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 23, 2009)

Citing Cases

In re CVR Energy, Inc.

The courts holding that the appellate remedy was adequate reasoned that a lack of exceptional circumstances…

In re Bustamante

Bell Tel. Co. v. Mitchell, 276 S.W.3d 443, 447 (Tex. 2008).In re Caterpillar, Inc., No. 04–09–00796–CV, 2009…