From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re C.A.T.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Aug 13, 2009
No. 09-09-00270-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 13, 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-09-00270-CV

Opinion Delivered August 13, 2009.

On Appeal from the 410th District Court Montgomery County, Texas, Trial Cause No. 07-12-12583 JV.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., GAULTNEY and HORTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On July 21, 2009, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless the appellant remitted the filing fee for the appeal. Appellant did not respond to the notice.

The trial court appointed counsel to represent C.A.T. in this appeal but found C.A.T.'s family can afford to pay the cost of the reporter's record. C.A.T. has not asserted that he cannot afford to pay the filing fee, nor has he asserted that his family cannot afford to pay the filing fee. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to pay the filing fee for the appeal, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

In re C.A.T.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Aug 13, 2009
No. 09-09-00270-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 13, 2009)
Case details for

In re C.A.T.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF C.A.T

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Aug 13, 2009

Citations

No. 09-09-00270-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 13, 2009)