From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Casteel

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Dec 20, 2019
NO. 19-B-1652 (La. Dec. 20, 2019)

Opinion

NO. 19-B-1652

12-20-2019

IN RE: DURWARD D. CASTEEL


ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

WEIMER, J., dissenting.

I respectfully dissent.

Disbarment is, at a minimum, an appropriate sanction in this matter and will require the respondent to apply for readmission to the practice of law, which readmission is never a foregone conclusion. However, given the significant amount of sums converted, the fact that there were multiple acts of conversion, including a forgery, the fact that no restitution has been paid, and because these facts are not at issue, pursuant to La. Sup. Ct. Rule XIX, § 11(G), I would order briefing on whether the sanction should be permanent disbarment.


Summaries of

In re Casteel

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Dec 20, 2019
NO. 19-B-1652 (La. Dec. 20, 2019)
Case details for

In re Casteel

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: DURWARD D. CASTEEL

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Dec 20, 2019

Citations

NO. 19-B-1652 (La. Dec. 20, 2019)