From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Cary

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Sep 17, 2010
No. 05-10-01071-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 17, 2010)

Opinion

No. 05-10-01071-CV

Opinion issued September 17, 2010.

Original Proceeding from the 380th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 380-54606-03.

Before Justices MOSELEY, LANG, and MYERS.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relator contends that respondent the Honorable John McCraw, Jr.'s orders in the underlying case are void because respondent was never properly assigned to hear the case. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to the relief requested. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992). Accordingly, we DENY relator's petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Cary

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Sep 17, 2010
No. 05-10-01071-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 17, 2010)
Case details for

In re Cary

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JENNIFER CARY, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Sep 17, 2010

Citations

No. 05-10-01071-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 17, 2010)

Citing Cases

In re C.H.C.

We denied relief because Mother "has not shown she is entitled to the relief requested." In re Cary, No.…

In re C.H.C.

We denied relief because Mother “has not shown she is entitled to the relief requested.” In re Cary, No.…