From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Carroll

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Ninth Circuit
May 26, 1981
11 B.R. 725 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1981)

Opinion

Bankruptcy No. AZ-81-1007-KHL.

May 26, 1981.

Roland J. LaVallee, Ryley, Carlock Ralston, Phoenix, Ariz., for appellant.

Paul J. West, Avondale, Ariz., for appellees.

Before KATZ, HUGHES and LASAROW, Bankruptcy Judges.


OPINION


Under the facts in this case the Arizona Bank held a valid security interest in a pickup truck owned by the debtors herein and valued at $2,400.00. In the court below the debtors applied for a redemption of the truck in installment payments. On January 1, 1981, Judge Maggiore ordered that a redemption under 11 U.S.C. § 722 can be made in installment payments. 7 B.R. 907 (Bkrtcy.).

11 U.S.C. § 722 provides:

"An individual debtor may, whether or not the debtor has waived the right to redeem under this section, redeem tangible personal property intended primarily for personal, family, or household use, from a lien securing a dischargeable consumer debt, if such property is exempted under Section 522 of this title or has been abandoned under § 554 of this title, by paying the holder of such lien the amount of the allowed secured claim of such holder that is secured by such lien." (Emphasis added).

After reviewing Section 722 and the applicable legislative history this court finds that a redemption must be made through a lump sum payment. See also In re Zimmerman, 4 B.R. 739, 2 C.B.C.2d 650 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Cal. 1980). To hold otherwise would frustrate the clear meaning of the section.

REVERSED.


Summaries of

In re Carroll

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Ninth Circuit
May 26, 1981
11 B.R. 725 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1981)
Case details for

In re Carroll

Case Details

Full title:In re Michael Harris CARROLL and Josie Carroll, Debtors. The ARIZONA BANK…

Court:United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 26, 1981

Citations

11 B.R. 725 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1981)

Citing Cases

In re Schweitzer

Although the case law on this issue is split, the weight of authority has held that redemption must be by a…

In re Lair

GMAC v. Miller (In re Miller), 4 B.R. 305 (Bankr.E.D.Mich. 1980) (Debtor unsuccessfully sought to redeem…