In re Care and Treatment of Chisolm

Full title: In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Alton Chisolm, Appellant…

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 7, 2017

2017-UP-240 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 7, 2017)

Opinion

2017-UP-240

06-07-2017

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Alton Chisolm, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2014-002351

James Kristian Falk, of Falk Law Firm, LLC, of Charleston, and Alton Chisolm, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted May 1, 2017

Appeal From Charleston County R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

James Kristian Falk, of Falk Law Firm, LLC, of Charleston, and Alton Chisolm, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).^[1] Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

[1] See In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 602 S.E.2d 58 (2004) (adopting the Anders procedure for alleged no-merit appeals in sexually violent predator involuntary commitment appeals).

APPEAL DISMISSED.²

2 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS and KONDUROS, JJ., and LEE, A. J., concur.