From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Cantu

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 28, 2024
24-cv-02185-PJH (N.D. Cal. May. 28, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-02185-PJH

05-28-2024

IN RE RICARDO CANTU, Plaintiff.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This case was opened when plaintiff, a Texas state prisoner proceeding pro se, wrote a letter to the court regarding obtaining his economic impact payment pursuant to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act. In an effort to protect his rights, it was filed as a new case. Plaintiff was informed that he had not filed a complaint and was given twenty-eight days to do so. He also was sent a notice that he had not paid the filing fee or applied for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”); again, he was allowed twenty-eight days to either pay the fee or file the application. A copy of the court's form for applications to proceed IFP was provided with the notice. Twenty-eight days has passed, and plaintiff has not submitted any filing or otherwise communicated with the court. This case is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice. No fee is due.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Cantu

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 28, 2024
24-cv-02185-PJH (N.D. Cal. May. 28, 2024)
Case details for

In re Cantu

Case Details

Full title:IN RE RICARDO CANTU, Plaintiff.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 28, 2024

Citations

24-cv-02185-PJH (N.D. Cal. May. 28, 2024)