In re C.A.G.

1 Citing case

  1. Trotto v. Rodrigues

    22-cv-12058-PBS (D. Mass. Mar. 6, 2024)

    The additional cases that Petitioner cites from various jurisdictions are equally unhelpful. See Docket No. 15, at 33-34 (collecting cases); see also State v. Smith, 185 S.E. 460, 460 (N.C. 1936) (no evidence that victim was aware that the defendants suspected the victim of having robbed them); In re. C.A.G., 786 S.E.2d 434 ( N.C. App. 2016) (no known motive for defendant to harm the victim); State v. Langley, 705 N.W.2d 340 (Iowa Ct. App. 2005) (same); Head v. United States, 451 A.2d 615 (D.C. 1982) (same); Clayton v. State, 658 N.E.2d 82 (Ind. App. 1995) (defendant was a stranger to the victim); State v. Robertson, 531 S.E.2d 490 ((Ind. App. 2000) (same); State v. Doss, 2008 Ohio 449 (Ohio App. 2008) (same); People v. Hill, 3 P.3d 898 (Cal. 2000) (same); Gaffney v. State, 940 S.W.2d 682 (Tex. App. 1996) (same); Chism v. State, 853 S.W.2d 255 (Ark. 1993) (same); State v. Jackson, 305 S.E.2d 703 ( N.C. 1983) (same); Smothers v. United States, 403 A.2d 306 (D.C. 1979) (same).