From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Burns

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Dec 18, 2003
No. 14-03-01240-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 18, 2003)

Opinion

No. 14-03-01240-CV

Opinion filed December 18, 2003.

Original Proceeding Writ of Mandamus.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied.

Panel consists of Justices YATES, HUDSON, and FOWLER.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On November 12, 2003, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See TEX. GOV'T. CODE ANN. § 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2003); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52. Relator challenges the trial court's alleged grant of a protective order in favor of real parties in interest, Sachie A. Canales and Klitsas Vercher.

Mandamus relief is available if the trial court abuses its discretion, either in resolving factual issues or in determining legal principles when there is no other adequate remedy by law. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992). Relator has not met his burden of establishing an abuse of discretion.

Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Burns

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Dec 18, 2003
No. 14-03-01240-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 18, 2003)
Case details for

In re Burns

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JEFFREY MICHAEL BURNS, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston

Date published: Dec 18, 2003

Citations

No. 14-03-01240-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 18, 2003)