From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Brunty

Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Nov 21, 2012
748 S.E.2d 777 (S.C. 2012)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2012–213410.

2012-11-21

In the Matter of Mark Andrew BRUNTY, Respondent.


ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). The petition also seeks appointment of an attorney to protect the interests of respondent's clients pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent's license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Elizabeth Jean Saraniti, Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent's client files, trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain. Ms. Saraniti shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent's clients. Ms. Saraniti may make disbursements from respondent's trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating account(s) of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Elizabeth Jean Saraniti, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that Elizabeth Jean Saraniti, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent's mail and the authority to direct that respondent's mail be delivered to Ms. Saraniti's office.

Ms. Saraniti's appointment shall be for a period of no longer than nine months unless an extension of the period of appointment is requested.

/s/Jean H. Toal, C.J.

/s/FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

In re Brunty

Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Nov 21, 2012
748 S.E.2d 777 (S.C. 2012)
Case details for

In re Brunty

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Mark Andrew BRUNTY, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Date published: Nov 21, 2012

Citations

748 S.E.2d 777 (S.C. 2012)
748 S.E.2d 777

Citing Cases

In re Bacon

Brunty hired Integrity Partners, LLC (Integrity), to process the loan modifications. This Court placed Brunty…