From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Brown

Supreme Court of California
Mar 5, 1965
62 Cal.2d 902 (Cal. 1965)

Opinion

Docket No. Crim. 8567.

March 5, 1965.

PROCEEDING to secure release from custody after commitment to a state hospital. Maurice C. Sparling, Judge. Order to show cause discharged and writ denied.

Sam Bubrick, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Petitioner.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Albert W. Harris, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for Respondents.


We issued an order to show cause in this matter so that we might consider whether petitioner would be entitled to relief by writ of habeas corpus in the event we should determine that an appeal did not lie from an order adjudging him insane and committing him to a state hospital pursuant to sections 1368 et seq. of the Penal Code.

In People v. Brown, ante, p. 901 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 837, 399 P.2d 373], filed this day, it is concluded that petitioner is entitled to appeal. No other basis appears for issuance of the writ.

The order to show cause is discharged, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Traynor, C.J., McComb, J., Peters, J., Tobriner, J., Mosk, J., and Schauer, J., concurred.

Retired Associate Justice of the Supreme Court sitting under assignment by the Chairman of the Judicial Council.


Summaries of

In re Brown

Supreme Court of California
Mar 5, 1965
62 Cal.2d 902 (Cal. 1965)
Case details for

In re Brown

Case Details

Full title:In re CHARLES ROBERT CARROL BROWN on Habeas Corpus

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Mar 5, 1965

Citations

62 Cal.2d 902 (Cal. 1965)
42 Cal. Rptr. 838
399 P.2d 374

Citing Cases

Tippett v. Nelson

In fact, petitioner's failure to seek relief pursuant to Rule 31(a) from his failure to file timely notice of…

Gardella v. Field

In fact, petitioner's failure to seek relief pursuant to Rule 31(a) from his failure to file timely notice of…